Jury Score – Federico Foschi – Case 4 – Endodontic Treatment

Diagnosis and treatment plan

8

Case Complexity

8

Quality of case documentation (Images)

8

Quality of case documentation (Text)

8

Accuracy of the execution of clinical procedures

8

Low degree of invasiveness

6

The quality of the immediate result (Post-op)

7

Follow-up

7

Stability over time of the result

7

Comments

Complex trauma, good management. Although fully indicated support opting for cbct with alarp consideration in young patients. Apical gauging may have supported use of MTA plug

Scor total

67.00