Jury Score – Mauricio González – Case 3 – Direct Restauration
Diagnosis and treatment plan
5
Case Complexity
8
Quality of case documentation (Images)
7
Quality of case documentation (Text)
6
Accuracy of the execution of clinical procedures
8
Low degree of invasiveness
9
The quality of the immediate result (Post-op)
4
Follow-up
3
Stability over time of the result
1
Comments
They did not show complete intraoral photos of the malocclusion, they did not remove the white stains completely at the gingival level of the restorations, and the end result was very poor because although they respected the mameloons of the incisal edges, they had to remember that after time, this wear out with the normal use of occlusion and mastication they level and get straight both for then upper and lower inciors, which means that the patients parent will have to get this chilf to a prosthodontist after thye orthodontic treatment and get new composite or porcelain veneers.