Jury Score – Mauricio González – Case 4 – Direct Restauration

Diagnosis and treatment plan

7

Case Complexity

3

Quality of case documentation (Images)

10

Quality of case documentation (Text)

9

Accuracy of the execution of clinical procedures

9

Low degree of invasiveness

9

The quality of the immediate result (Post-op)

8

Follow-up

8

Stability over time of the result

9

Comments

Although this case was not very complex and very easy, it was very good that they took full mouth intraoral photographs of the occlusion. But they did not addressed that the patient lost a lower second bicuspid and all the lower midlines were shifted to the patient’s left side. So she presented a Class II Molar and cuspid malocclusion on the left side and a Class I molar and cuspid occlusion on the right side. The treatment was easy and conservative but, I would really liked, that at the end of the treatment, they should also polished the incisal edges of the upper incisors with a Composite polishing bur. So, that they will look even and straight like the two restorations of the upper peg lateral incisors.

Scor total

72.00