Jury Score – Laura Iosif – Case 7 – Endodontic Treatment

Diagnosis and treatment plan

9

Case Complexity

9

Quality of case documentation (Images)

9

Quality of case documentation (Text)

9

Accuracy of the execution of clinical procedures

9

Low degree of invasiveness

10

The quality of the immediate result (Post-op)

10

Follow-up

9

Stability over time of the result

16

Comments

Nu este foarte deductibil daca ulterior s-a reaplicat lucrarea protetica anterioara 47-45, sau daca s-a refacut lucrarea protetica. In situatia. in care s-a refacut, s-a omis patologia periapicala a dintelui stalp 45. In ambele cazuri liseste verificarea ocluziei

Scor total

90.00